Reset Password
If you've forgotten your password, you can enter your email address below. An email will then be sent with a link to set up a new password.
Cancel
Reset Link Sent
If the email is registered with our site, you will receive an email with instructions to reset your password. Password reset link sent to:
Check your email and enter the confirmation code:
Don't see the email?
  • Resend Confirmation Link
  • Start Over
Close
If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service

Member Deleted Post  

posts

Member Deleted Post


This post has been deleted by

chopper6921 56M
2805 posts
10/23/2017 7:09 am

Looks like fun


Leegs2012 51M
96137 posts
10/23/2017 5:20 pm

Question> Do you want to be naked with me?!! I would rock your world!!


ProfPlayful 53M
3861 posts
10/23/2017 10:28 pm

My favorite guilty pleasure is reading AdultFriendFinder blogs, including yours.

Hot stuff, guaranteed!

Thank you, lovely Flower.

My featured post this week: Pulling Fantasy Sex Out of My Ass.


discreteSteve62 50M
2169 posts
10/24/2017 11:35 pm

Like ProfPlayful wrote, the blogs here are a good guilty pleasure.

As for actual naughty play desires, the most plausible kink would be another go at "watch and be watched". That way my wife and I get completely safe play with really good partners, plus the hotness of putting on a show for someone else who is (presumably) enjoying the show. If the someone else is a couple also putting on a show, that's a bonus.

Another plausible desire is to be better at indulging my wife's kinks. I know just how to indulge her vanilla desires, but I'm not as good at indulging her kinks.

Then there's the fantasy of fooling around with another woman, which works for both of us as a fantasy, but is highly unlikely as a physical indulgence. It's not just the scarcity of women interested in couples. There's also the limited overlap between women I find attractive and women she finds attractive, and our caution about health.


dan_nl_2006 42M
1117 posts
10/26/2017 8:18 pm

    Quoting  :

So in your MFM, would you like both guys inside you at once.
BTW


discreteSteve62 50M
2169 posts
10/28/2017 2:14 am

Yes I suppose it's tough to find hot chicks that just want to be used as a prop for a couples sex play. But pros are the easiest, you can find the body and face that you both want, and she goes away after.

When we've considered looking for a third, we weren't just wishing for a "prop". We would have wanted someone who was just as interested in being with a couple as we were in having another woman with us. Some women, including my wife, are attracted to both men and women. Some few of those are also interested in sex with both at the same time, if they're attracted to both members of the couple, or maybe if they're so interested in one of them that they're OK with the other. But such women are rare, and although there are probably women who would find both of us attractive, and who we'd both find attractive, the chances of finding any of them are very low.

Here's another way to think about what I'm getting at: you're not interested in women or man-woman couples, but you are turned on by the possibility of sex with two men at once. Would you consider yourself as a prop for the hypothetical two guys? Or a woman who is turned on by being with more than one person of the appropriate gender at a time? Besides being a third for my wife and me, the hypothetical other woman would also be a woman who is turned on by being with two people of opposite gender.

Obviously if we sought out a pro we'd be able to pick someone who matched both our appearance preferences (as long is there was any overlap in our preferences), but we would both also want someone who wanted to fool around with us as much as we wanted to fool around with her. Our partners' pleasure is important to both of us, but that doesn't include the mercenary pleasure of getting paid. So even aside from the other practical problems of a pro (higher disease risk, illegality issues, and the possibility that we might be supporting trafficking), it wouldn't really fit what we'd like.

(The illegality issues aren't just the possibility of getting caught and prosecuted, though the severity of consequences is enough to discourage it even if the risk of getting caught is low. Illegality also means the risk of crimes other than just the transaction itself, such as theft or assault by a criminal associate. Those issues could be avoided in parts of Nevada, but pay-for-play still doesn't fit with what we'd like.)


Become a member to create a blog